|
|
|
|

|
|
Participatory approaches |
|

|
|
Farmer participation and breeding rice for rainfed rice environments
|
|
.gif)
|
|
To describe the need
for farmer paticipation in rice breeding
To clarify the social
science component and the plant breeding component in participatory plant
breeding (PPB)
To describe farmers’
criteria for selecting rice varieties
To explain how to use
attitude, skills and knowledge to obtain quality information and effective
cooperation from farmers
To describe appropriate
interview techniques to facilitate group discussions or individual interviews
|
|
|
|
1. Why involve farmers in
rice varietal evaluation and selection?
While classical breeding
has been successful in favorable rice environments there has been limited
impact in unfavorable rainfed environments.
Despite the many released rice varieties, adoption rates by the farmers
remain low.

Possible reasons for poor adoption of modern varieties
in rainfed environments
Often the researchers do not understand
the farmers’ needs. They assume that improved productivity (yield) is
enough to ensure the adoption of a new variety by the farmers.
There is a huge variability in rainfed
areas. Farmers seldom adopt developed technology packages. Farmers will
rather ADAPT than ADOPT technologies as they like to experiment. Farmers
often lack access to new technology options and information about the
benefits and limitations of the options.
-->There is a lack of innovative methods
in technology transfer and scaling up. |
|
|
|
2. What is the goal of "participatory
plant breeding" (PPB)?
To increase the adoption of improved rice varieties suitable for rainfed
ecosystem and hence increase food (rice) security of the resource poor
households and communities.
|
|
|
|
3. The social science component
in PPB
Participatory Plant Breeding involves outside
its plant breeding component also a social science component.
For example:
Select
and characterize the target research site (biophysical, social and economic)
and typologies of farmers, gender roles
Understand how rice
fits into farmers’ cropping/farming systems and its importance in the
livelihood systems
Identify past and current
rice varieties grown by farmers according to specific land types
Identify
farmers’ constraints in adopting released varieties and understand selection
criteria of farmers (gender, social groups, ethnicity)
Facilitate and assess
farmer participation in “mother-baby” trials
Facilitate diffusion
of Participatory varietal selection (PVS) lines in the community (scaling
up)
Assess the impact of
“farmer/community participatory approach” and adoption of lines evaluated
through PVS
What are criteria when selecting research
sites?
These sites should represent the major rice ecosystem
with the problem of concern (submergence
prone, drought
prone, salt-affected, flood prone) for the breeding program
These sites should have an extensive rice area
wherein research can make an impact
Accessibility to roads and other infrastructure
is important
On-farm trials should be visible to other farmers
in the community
|
|
|
|
4. At what stages of the
breeding process can farmers be involved?
Participatory
Varietal selection (PVS)

Eliciting farmers’ selection criteria of rice lines
managed by farmers on their own fields –”Baby” trials

Assessing the post harvest qualities of PVS lines
Participatory
Plant Breeding (PPB)
Sensory
Evaluation

Assessment of cooking quality of rice
...

Plant breeding stages wherein farmers can participate
|
|
|
|
5. What are the
farmers’ criteria when selecting rice varieties?
Recording farmers’ assessments
of new varieties gave the following results:
lowlands - long
duration photosensitive varieties
uplands - early
and medium duration, photo-insensitive
Can withstand drought,
submergence, floods, problem soils (salinity)
Yield (stable or higher
than varieties farmers use)
But also:
Quality
(size, color, shape and texture of grain, eating, cooking, aromatic, glutinous,
color); left-over
rice stays soft, good for rice wine, good for making other rice products
(puffed rice)
Good for livelihood
uses (straw for animal feed, roof)
Should fit into the
cropping/farming systems
Requires low inputs
Demands high price
in the market
|
Example of a farmers’ assessment |
|
|
Different socio-economic groups, gender,
ethnicity may have different criteria:
Social
groups
Large/Upper caste farmers want fine grains for the market while small/marginal/lower
caste farmers want coarse grains which stays longer in the stomach and
want varieties where the left over rice remains soft.
Gender
– determined by gender roles
Men want high yields, resistant to pests and disease
Women want varieties suitable for rice products, varieties easy to thresh,
varieties that can compete with weeds, the quality and quantity of straw
should be good for animal feed. It has to have a high milling recovery,
the rice should expand after cooking; and other quality traits
Ethnicity
Good for making rice wine, aromatic and glutinous, black rice, good
quality for special occasions, gifts...
|
|
|
|
6. How to investigate the
impact of farmer participation in breeding programs?
Evaluate resulting
rice diversity in farmers’ fields
Assess changes in no.
of farmers growing specific varieties, area grown to different varieties
by land type, rice productivity, rice income
Assess adoption rate
of introduced rice varieties
Assess attitude changes
of farmers, extension workers and researchers
Document farmers’ perceptions
on PVS and impact on their livelihood and well-being
Access
to quality seeds and establishment of community efforts e.g. seed banks,
self-help groups?
No. of released lines
under PVS Access to quality seeds and establishment of community efforts
e.g. seed banks, self-help groups
No. of released lines
under PVS?
Benefit cost analysis
of conventional vs. participatory approach?
Empowerment of farmer/communities/women
farmers?
Institutionalization
of participatory approaches in plant breeding in universities, research
institutions?
|
|
|
|
7. How can non-social scientists
obtain quality information and effective cooperation from farmers?
Some tips:
Attitude
Be
willing to learn and not to preach
Observe
local protocol and norms (consider gender, ethnicity, caste, wealth) groups
Develop
and show interest in farmers’ farming practices
Communicate
to express and not to impress
Build
trust and a mutually beneficial working relationship
Avoid
non-verbal messages
Be
respectful with farmers’ time
Skills
Listen
actively
Observe
closely and systematically
Learn
and use the local language
Probe
to add depth to farmers’ response
Inquire
and record as neutrally and value-free as
possible
Make
documentation recording as systematic and unobtrusive as possible
Facilitate
farmer community meetings and explain roles, decision-making, ownership,
degree and type of participation, sharing of inputs
Knowledge
Be
familiar with target sites and environment (biophysical, socio-economic,
cultural, political)
Learn
farmers’ indigenous knowledge, needs, criteria, and preference, varieties
they used to grow and prefer to grow
Understand
farmers’ local concepts, criteria & measures
Use
triangulation and gather information from diverse key informants
|
|
|
|
Appreciating
Farmer’s Opinions
Use
body language to show interest
Use
encouraging words or gestures, head movements indicating assent
Use
open-ended questions that invite participation
Rephrase
what you’ve heard to show that you’re listening and that you understand
Request
more conciseness and information on what you heard
At
appropriate points, summarize what’s been said without distortion
Listening
to the Farmer (Dos)
Give
farmers time to respond
Sit
comfortably, possibly on the same level with them
Make
eye contact (as far as culturally acceptable)
Smile,
have a sense of humor
Maintain
a relaxed body position
Lean
forward intently
Listening
to the Farmer (Don’ts)
Get
impatient with or interrupt the farmer
Contradict
the farmer or point of finger to face
Show
disapproval of farmers’ statement, even when disagree
Express
judgement of what’s being said
Completely
ignore women
Give
the farmer advice during the interview
Convey
boredom, verbally or nonverbally
|
|
|
|
8. How to do group discussions
or individual interviews?
Pay courtesy to village leader
Explain the objectives of the project and seek
permission to conduct interviews
Greet the farmers. If necessary interview key
informants, separate social groups
Introduce yourself and your team
Explain to farmer why you are conducting the interviews.
Build rapport.
Start with the phrase “We want to learn” from
you
Avoid bringing thick questionnaires
|
|
|
|
9. How to facilitate group
meetings?
Stop any individual from dominating the meeting
Encourage contributions from all farmers, especially
the women
Guide the meeting towards its goals
Manage the pace of the meeting to maintain farmers’
interest
Assign a recorder and facilitator in the meeting
If possible, provide light snacks during the meeting
Summarize the results of the discussion
-->And remember to use the open-ended and probing questions
|
|
|
|
Type of Questions
Leading – normally imply the kind of response expected
Direct – aimed at obtaining specific information
Open (divergent) – give the interviewee free rein of expression by not
explicitly directing his/her response
Open
ended questions (examples)
Can you tell me more about this?
What would be an example of that?
What are some reasons for that?
Could you help me understand this better?
How you any other ideas about this?
How do you feel about that?
How do you think other farmers would feel about
this?
How would you describe this?
What are the positive and negative traits of this
variety?
Probing
= a technique that
Combines good listening with asking questions
which direct the flow of the interviewee’s spontaneous comments unobtrusively
Checks understanding of the interviewee’s point
of view
Checks consistency of interviewee’s answers
By: Mirror technique (restating), Asking questions to confirm, Repeating
a comment made earlier, Asking for clarification, Paraphrasing, Admitting
uncertainty,...
Probing gives you more information than what
was first offered
For example,
the following was asked:
Why do you prefer this variety?
What do you like/dislike in this variety?
|
|
|
|
The answer you get... |
How you probe for more information... |
It has high/low/average yield |
How high is high/low/average compared to preferred local variety? |
It has high market demand |
Why high market demand?
What qualities do consumers look for? |
Farm laborers prefer it |
Why do farm laborers like it? |
We are happy with the duration |
Why are you happy with the duration? What is maturity period?
Why do you like early varieties? |
It is easier to grow
|
How can you tell it is easier to grow? |
It fits our cropping system |
How does it fit in your cropping system? What crops do you grow or want
to grow before and after rice? |
|
Let's conclude |
|
The benefits from farmer participation are:
Adaptation of varieties on farmers field
Suitability of varieties to farmers condition
and needs
Inclusion of farmer’s own innovation and local
knowledge
Farmer participation
in breeding can improve the selection of suitable varieties for complex
rainfed environments because
farmers’ are given the opportunity to screen new
varieties on their specific environment rather in controlled experiment
stations;
farmers’ selection criteria for rice varieties
are better understood by
breeders
Meeting farmer needs may be better tackled by creating different varieties
rather than trying to produce multi-purpose varieties |
|
Next lesson
|
|
This concludes this course. Please have a look at the contributors of
the course and send feedback to IRRITraining@cgiar.org
if you have ideas to edit or improve this course. |
|
|
|
|
|